TAMU Homepage TAMU Libraries Homepage TAMU Digital Library Homepage
NOTE: This item is not available outside the Texas A&M University network. Texas A&M affiliated users who are off campus can access the item through NetID and password authentication or by using TAMU VPN. Non-affiliated individuals should request a copy through their local library's interlibrary loan service.

What has Chihara's mathematical nominalism gained over mathematical realism?

Show full item record

Title: What has Chihara's mathematical nominalism gained over mathematical realism?
Author: Hoshi, Tomohiro
Abstract: The indispensability argument, which claims that science requires beliefs in mathematical entities, gives a strong motivation for mathematical realism. However, mathematical realism bears Benacerrafian ontological and epistemological problems. Although recent accounts of mathematical realism have attempted to cope with these problems, it seems that, at least, a satisfactory account of epistemology of mathematics has not been presented. For instance, Maddy's realism with perceivable sets and Resnik's and Shapiro's structuralism have their own epistemological problems. This fact has been a reason to rebut the indispensability argument and adopt mathematical nominalism. Since mathematical nominalism purports to be committed only to concretia, it seems that mathematical nominalism is epistemically friendlier than mathematical realism. However, when it comes to modal mathematical nominalism, this claim is not trivial. There is a reason for doubting the modal primitives that it invokes. In this thesis, this doubt is investigated through Chihara's Constructibility Theory. Chihara's Constructibility Theory purports not to be committed to abstracta by replacing existential assertions of the standard mathematics with ones of constructibility. However, the epistemological status of the primitives in Chihara's system can be doubted. Chihara might try to argue that the problem would dissolve by using possible world semantics as a didactic device to capture the primitive notions. Nonetheless, his analysis of possible world semantic is not plausible, when considered as a part of the project of nominalizing mathematics in terms of the Constructibility Theory.
Description: Due to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality control issues may be present in this document. Please report any quality issues you encounter to digital@library.tamu.edu, referencing the URI of the item.
Includes bibliographical references (leaves 61-62).
Issued also on microfiche from Lange Micrographics.
Publisher: Texas A&M University
Subject: philosophy.
Major philosophy.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2003-THESIS-H66
Date: 2003

Citation

Hoshi, Tomohiro (2003). What has Chihara's mathematical nominalism gained over mathematical realism?. Master's thesis, Texas A&M University. Available electronically from http : / /hdl .handle .net /1969 .1 /ETD -TAMU -2003 -THESIS -H66.

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
2003 Thesis H66.pdf 1.777Mb PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

Request Open Access

This item and its contents are restricted. If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open-access. This will allow all visitors to view the contents of the thesis.

Request Open Access